Curated Optogenetic Publication Database

Abstract: Phototropin is the designation originally assigned to a recently characterized chromoprotein that serves as a photoreceptor for phototropism. Phototropin is a light-activated autophosphorylating serine/threonine kinase that binds two flavin mononucleotide (FMN) molecules that function as blue light-absorbing chromophores. Each FMN molecule is bound in a rigid binding pocket within specialized PAS (PER-ARNT-SIM superfamily) domains, known as LOV (light, oxygen, or voltage) domains. This article reviews the detailed photobiological and biochemical characterization of the light-activated phosphorylation reaction of phototropin and follows the sequence of events leading to the cloning, sequencing, and characterization of the gene and the subsequent biochemical characterization of its encoded protein. It then considers recent biochemical and photochemical evidence that light activation of phototropin involves the formation of a cysteinyl adduct at the C(4a) position of the FMN chromophores. Adduct formation causes a major conformational change in the chromophores and a possible conformational change in the protein moiety as well. The review concludes with a brief discussion of the evidence for a second phototropin-like protein in Arabidopsis and rice. Possible roles for this photoreceptor are discussed.

Abstract: The signaling pathways by which the phytochrome (phy) family of photoreceptors transmits sensory information to light-regulated genes remain to be fully defined. Evidence for a relatively direct pathway has been provided by the binding of one member of the family, phyB, to a promoter-element-bound, basic helix-loop-helix protein, PIF3, specifically upon light-induced conversion of the photoreceptor molecule to its biologically active conformer (Pfr). Here, we show that phyA also binds selectively and reversibly to PIF3 upon photoconversion to Pfr, but that the apparent affinity of PIF3 for phyA is 10-fold lower than for phyB. This result is consistent with previous in vivo data from PIF3-deficient Arabidopsis, indicating that PIF3 has a major role in phyB signaling, but a more minor role in phyA signaling. We also show that phyB binds stoichiometrically to PIF3 at an equimolar ratio, suggesting that the resultant complex is the unit active in transcriptional regulation at target promoters. Deletion mapping suggests that a 37-aa segment present at the N terminus of phyB, but absent from phyA, contributes strongly to the high binding affinity of phyB for PIF3. Conversely, deletion mapping and point mutation analysis of PIF3 for determinants involved in recognition of phyB indicates that the PAS domain of PIF3 is a major contributor to this interaction, but that a second determinant in the C-terminal domain is also necessary.

Abstract: The phytochrome photoreceptor family directs plant gene expression by switching between biologically inactive and active conformers in response to the sequential absorption of red and farred photons. Several intermediates that act late in the phytochrome signalling pathway have been identified, but fewer have been identified that act early in the pathway. We have cloned a nuclear basic helix-loop-helix protein, PIF3, which can bind to non-photoactive carboxy-terminal fragments of phytochromes A and B and functions in phytochrome signalling in vivo. Here we show that full-length photoactive phytochrome B binds PIF3 in vitro only upon light-induced conversion to its active form, and that photoconversion back to its inactive form causes dissociation from PIF3. We conclude that photosensory signalling by phytochrome B involves light-induced, conformer-specific recognition of the putative transcriptional regulator PIF3, providing a potential mechanism for direct photoregulation of gene expression.

Abstract: The effects of nerve growth factor (NGF) and dibutyryl cyclic AMP (DBC) on the density of cytoskeletal structures in cultured dorsal root ganglia were examined using morphometric techniques. After 24 hr in culture, NGF-treated neurites were longer than either DBC-treated or control neurites. At 48 hr, neurites produced in response to NGF and DBC were of equivalent length, while controls were considerably shorter. Comparison of electron micrographs of neuritic profiles revealed some differences of area and cytoskeletal density between treatment groups. Morphometric analysis was used to determine these differences under several growth conditions, at various rates of elongation and at different neurite lengths. As shown by analysis of variance, both NGF-treated and control neurites tapered in diameter at 48 hr in vitro, while DBC-induced neurites increased in area. An increase in cytoskeletal density for all treatment groups indicated that density was not always correlated with changes in area. An increased density of microtubules as compared to neurofilaments was seen at 24 hr, with equal densities of both cytoskeletal elements present after 48 hr in vitro. Comparisons between individual groups of data indicated that NGF-treated neurites relied primarily on microtubular density at 24 hr in vitro, when NGF induced longer, faster growing neurites. At 48 hr, there was an increase in neurofilaments proximal to the explant in the presence of DBC, implying that DBC may cause increased synthesis and/or transport of these structures. A comparison of microtubule to neurofilament ratios indicated that at 24 hr, there was always a greater density of microtubules. However, after 48 hr, neurofilament density increased such that there were equivalent densities of both cytoskeletal elements, possibly due to the overall increase in length observed in each treatment group. These data imply that 1) neurites with different rates of elongation may exhibit differences in cytoskeletal density; 2) neurites of equivalent lengths may be of differing stabilities; 3) NGF and DBC produce neurites with different cytoskeletal densities, implying divergent mechanisms of neurite induction; 4) the presence or absence of NGF may be partially responsible for variations in cytoskeletal densities observed between peripheral and central processes of DRG during development.

Abstract: Divalent cations induce the aggregation of chromaffin granule ghosts (CG membranes) at millimolar concentrations. Monovalent cations produce the same effect at 100-fold higher concentrations. The kinetics of the dimerization phase were followed by light-scattering changes observed in stopped-flow rapid mixing experiments. The rate constant for Ca2+-induced dimerization (kapp) is 0.86-1.0 x 10(9) M-1sec-1, based on the "molar" vesicle concentration. This value is close to the values predicted by theory for the case of diffusion-controlled reaction (7.02 x 10(9) M-1sec-1), indicating that there is no energy barrier to dimerization. Arrhenius plots between 10 degrees and 42 degrees C support this; the activation energy observed, +4.4 Kcal, is close to the value (4.6-4.8 Kcal) predicted for diffusion control according to theory. Artificial vesicles prepared from CG lipids were also found to have cation-induced aggregation, but the rates (values of kapp) were less than 1/100 as large as those with native CG membranes. Also, significant differences were found with respect to cation specificity. It is concluded that the slow rates are due to the low probability that the segments of membrane which approach will be matched in polar head group composition and disposition. Thus large numbers of approaches are necessary before matched segments come into aposition. The salient features of the chromaffin granule membrane aggregation mechanism are as follows: (a) In the absence of cations capable of shielding and binding, the membranes are held apart by electrostatic repulsion of their negatively charged surfaces. (b) The divalent and monovalent cation effects on aggregation are due to their ability to shield these charges, allowing a closer approach of the membrane surfaces. (c) The major determinants of the aggregation rates of CG membranes are proteins which protrude from the (phospholipid) surface of the membrane and serve as points of primary contact. Transmembrane contact between these proteins does not require full neutralization of the surface charge and surface potential arising from the negatively charged phospholipids. (d) After contact between proteins is established, the interaction between membranes can be strengthened through transmembrane hydrogen bonding of phosphatidyl ethanolamine polar head groups, divalent cation-mediated salt bridging, and segregation of phosphatidylcholine out of the region of contact.

Abstract: Abstract not available.