Curated Optogenetic Publication Database

Search precisely and efficiently by using the advantage of the hand-assigned publication tags that allow you to search for papers involving a specific trait, e.g. a particular optogenetic switch or a host organism.

Qr: author:"Hao Li"
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 results
1.

Coordinated regulation of diverse F-actin organizations orchestrates F-actin pulses in the actomyosin network.

blue LOVTRAP D. melanogaster in vivo Control of cytoskeleton / cell motility / cell shape
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 8 Sep 2026 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2530056123 Link to full text
Abstract: Pulsatile actomyosin networks emerge as a widespread mechanism driving tissue morphogenesis. Compared with myosin-II pulses, F-actin pulses are largely unexplored. By studying Drosophila oogenesis, we report that basal pulsatile actomyosin networks consist of F-actin bundle and meshwork architectures, implicating the existence of different F-actin microstructures and corresponding nucleators. Here, Rac1 and the Scar/WAVE-Arp2/3 complex (branched F-actin nucleator), exhibiting constant levels, are necessary to support F-actin pulsation, whereas pulses of Dia (unbranched F-actin nucleator) trigger F-actin pulsation. The pulsatile F-actin networks recruit the F-actin turnover regulator cofilin, thus generating cofilin pulses. Cofilin at relatively low concentration can cooperate with F-actin nucleators to amplify F-actin and enhance its pulsation, while cofilin at relatively high concentration might trigger the F-actin disassembly to attenuate its pulsation. These two different effects of cofilin on F-actin pulsation were confirmed by Zdk-cofilin optogenetics. Rac1 signaling, Dia, and cofilin are also crucial for F-actin pulses in border cell migration. Our findings thus reveal a coordinated regulation of F-actin pulses conferring actomyosin contractility in morphogenesis and cell migration.
2.

Phase-driven rewiring in Escherichia coli enhances coenzyme Q10 biosynthesis via temporal and energetic coordination.

blue YtvA E. coli Transgene expression
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 24 Nov 2025 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-025-13619-7 Link to full text
Abstract: Coenzyme Q10 biosynthesis in Escherichia coli is constrained by kinetic mismatches between precursor synthesis and methylation, alongside bioenergetic uncoupling. We implemented an optogenetic phase-control strategy integrating dynamic light induction, ribosome binding site (RBS) engineering, and real-time membrane potential (ΔΨ) feedback. Temporal coordination of 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase (DXS) and UbiG methyltransferase (UbiG) via a 6-h phase delay reduced methylglyoxal shunt flux by 41 ± 3% (p < 0.01) through enhanced precursor channeling. Membrane hyperpolarization to - 90 ± 2 mV (relative to - 70 mV in controls) triggered voltage-gated UbiG membrane localization (62 ± 3%) and ATP-driven S-adenosylmethionine regeneration, increasing methylation efficiency 2.3-fold. Multivariate modeling identified ΔΨ and acetate as critical control parameters, enabling optimized fermentation (dissolved oxygen (DO) 15-20%, pH 6.7-6.9). The engineered strain achieved 0.63 ± 0.07 g/L CoQ10 in 5-L bioreactors-a 4.3-fold improvement over the static control strain (0.15 ± 0.02 g/L)-with 82.5% carbon efficiency and 25.8% glycerol-to-product yield. This work establishes bioenergetically coupled temporal control as a scalable paradigm for membrane-bound isoprenoid biomanufacturing. KEY POINTS: • Phase-driven enzyme synchronization via optogenetics resolves kinetic mismatch. • Membrane hyperpolarization gates enzyme localization and ATP regeneration. • Model-integrated bioenergetic-process control enhances CoQ10 production efficiency.
3.

Two Rac1 pools integrate the direction and coordination of collective cell migration.

blue AsLOV2 D. melanogaster in vivo Control of cytoskeleton / cell motility / cell shape
Nat Commun, 12 Oct 2022 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33727-6 Link to full text
Abstract: Integration of collective cell direction and coordination is believed to ensure collective guidance for efficient movement. Previous studies demonstrated that chemokine receptors PVR and EGFR govern a gradient of Rac1 activity essential for collective guidance of Drosophila border cells, whose mechanistic insight is unknown. By monitoring and manipulating subcellular Rac1 activity, here we reveal two switchable Rac1 pools at border cell protrusions and supracellular cables, two important structures responsible for direction and coordination. Rac1 and Rho1 form a positive feedback loop that guides mechanical coupling at cables to achieve migration coordination. Rac1 cooperates with Cdc42 to control protrusion growth for migration direction, as well as to regulate the protrusion-cable exchange, linking direction and coordination. PVR and EGFR guide correct Rac1 activity distribution at protrusions and cables. Therefore, our studies emphasize the existence of a balance between two Rac1 pools, rather than a Rac1 activity gradient, as an integrator for the direction and coordination of collective cell migration.
Submit a new publication to our database